linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43446124-b99a-32d8-f797-7ec0cdca9ee4@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 23:05:30 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
        Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@...labora.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
        Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Hellström <thomas_os@...pmail.org>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment

On 7/15/22 09:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 7/15/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 15.07.22 um 02:52 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>>> Intel i915 GPU driver uses wait-wound mutex to lock multiple GEMs on the
>>> attachment to the i915 dma-buf. In order to let all drivers utilize
>>> shared
>>> wait-wound context during attachment in a general way, make dma-buf
>>> core to
>>> acquire the ww context internally for the attachment operation and update
>>> i915 driver to use the importer's ww context instead of the internal one.
>>>
>>>  From now on all dma-buf exporters shall use the importer's ww context
>>> for
>>> the attachment operation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     |  8 +++++-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  2 +-
>>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  6 ++---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            | 26 +++++++++++++++----
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            | 15 +++++++++--
>>>   7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> index 0ee588276534..37545ecb845a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static struct sg_table * __map_dma_buf(struct
>>> dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>>    * Optionally this calls &dma_buf_ops.attach to allow
>>> device-specific attach
>>>    * functionality.
>>>    *
>>> + * Exporters shall use ww_ctx acquired by this function.
>>> + *
>>>    * Returns:
>>>    *
>>>    * A pointer to newly created &dma_buf_attachment on success, or a
>>> negative
>>> @@ -822,6 +824,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>>                   void *importer_priv)
>>>   {
>>>       struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>>> +    struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
>>>       int ret;
>>>         if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
>>> @@ -841,7 +844,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>>       attach->importer_ops = importer_ops;
>>>       attach->importer_priv = importer_priv;
>>>   -    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>>> +    ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &reservation_ww_class);
>>> +    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, &ww_ctx);
>>
>> That won't work like this. The core property of a WW context is that you
>> need to unwind all the locks and re-quire them with the contended one
>> first.
>>
>> When you statically lock the imported one here you can't do that any more.
> 
> You're right. I felt that something is missing here, but couldn't
> notice. I'll think more about this and enable
> CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH. Thank you!
> 

Christian, do you think we could make an excuse for the attach()
callback and make the exporter responsible for taking the resv lock? It
will be inconsistent with the rest of the callbacks, where importer
takes the lock, but it will be the simplest and least invasive solution.
It's very messy to do a cross-driver ww locking, I don't think it's the
right approach.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry