[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ef53978-f26e-89e3-8b04-6f0eb183f200@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:00:39 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com, fabiomirmar@...il.com,
alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de, corbet@....net,
d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] notifier: Show function names on notifier
routines if DEBUG_NOTIFIERS is set
On 19/07/2022 17:48, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> [...]
> I would totally support an approach where instead of pr_info, there's a tracepoint
> for these events (and that shouldnt' need to be conditional on a config option)
>
> that's not what the patch does though.
This is a good idea Arjan! We could use trace events or pr_debug() -
which one do you prefer?
With that, we could maybe remove this Kconfig option, having it always
enabled, what do you think ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists