linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: don't allow the same type rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtVLkO6T-0n7fMBTvR84Ji8GhTO5==u9v+8f+dRkJhFHMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:53:09 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't allow the same type rq_qos add more than once

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:37 PM Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> From: hanjinke <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
>
> In our test of iocost, we encounttered some list add/del corrutions of
> inner_walk list in ioc_timer_fn.
> The resean can be descripted as follow:
>
> cpu 0                                           cpu 1
> ioc_qos_write                                   ioc_qos_write
>
> ioc = q_to_ioc(bdev_get_queue(bdev));
> if (!ioc) {
>         ioc = kzalloc();                        ioc = q_to_ioc(bdev_get_queue(bdev));
>                                                         if (!ioc) {
>                                                                 ioc = kzalloc();
>                                                                 ...
>                                                                 rq_qos_add(q, rqos);
>                                                          }
>         ...
>         rq_qos_add(q, rqos);
>         ...
> }
>
> When the io.cost.qos file is written by two cpu concurrently, rq_qos may
> be added to one disk twice. In that case, there will be two iocs enabled
> and running on one disk. They own different iocgs on their active list.
> In the ioc_timer_fn function, because of the iocgs from two ioc have the
> same root iocg, the root iocg's walk_list may be overwritten by each
> other and this lead to list add/del corrutions in building or destorying
> the inner_walk list.
>
> And so far, the blk-rq-qos framework works in case that one instance for
> one type rq_qos per queue by default. This patch make this explicit and
> also fix the crash above.
>
> Signed-off-by: hanjinke <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>

The change LGTM. Maybe it is better to add a Fixes tag here so that
others can easily know what Linux versions should be backported.

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>

Thanks.