linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: use SNOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ac08f08010a71e288b0114fc02d47a4@walle.cc>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:02:08 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com
Cc:     p.yadav@...com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at,
        vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: use SNOR_ID3() for w25q512nwm

Am 2022-07-19 08:00, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com:
> On 7/18/22 10:25, Michael Walle wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know 
>> the content is safe
>> 
>> Am 2022-07-12 10:40, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com:
>>> Shaik, can we have your Tested-by tag on this?
>> 
>> Sigh. His email address bounces with "The email address you
>> entered couldn't be found." So don't expect a Tested-by: here.
>> 
> 
> Would you drop this and pick the other patches that use your SNOR_ID3
> and submit them all in a single patch set?

I can collect the other patches, but why drop this if we know
for a fact that the flash will work? (Because it is the same
as the w25q512nwq)

-michael