linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: meson: s4: add s4 SoC clock controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:33:10 +0800
From:   Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: meson: s4: add s4 SoC clock controller driver



On 2022/7/19 15:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> On 19/07/2022 08:58, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ M:	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
>>>>>>     L:	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
>>>>>>     S:	Maintained
>>>>>>     F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic*
>>>>>> -F:	drivers/clk/meson/
>>>>>> +F:	drivers/clk/meson/*
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>> Warning is displayed when using checkpatch. I will correct it.
>>>
>>> What warning?
>>    ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict
>> 0001-clk-meson-s4-add-s4-SoC-clock-controller-driver.patch
>> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
>> If I add that strange change, I won't have this WARNING.
>> Should I ignore this warning?
> 
> Yes, it's not related to the patch and the change you made looks not
> correct.
Thank you very much for your suggestion and I will correct it in the 
next patch.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> .