[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d67e3a36-ccc7-2fb5-35da-315212370776@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:37:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>,
Sven Schwermer <sven.schwermer@...ruptive-technologies.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: lp50xx: correct reg/unit
addresses in example
On 20/06/2022 18:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/06/2022 09:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The multi-led node defined address/size cells, so it is intended to have
>> children with unit addresses.
>>
>> The second multi-led's reg property defined three LED indexes within one
>> reg item, which is not correct - these are three separate items.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>
>> ---
>
> Pavel, Jacek,
>
> Any comments on these two patches?
Pavel,
Although previously this was "just" correcting the example, now it is
actually a needed fix because of changes which came later:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqKHviWcynOu5AYJxtJ5xbQU6cU+r6tHy=ao+Wt4mE1aVQ@mail.gmail.com/
Can you apply it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists