[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cff61541-2c12-964c-ad87-3852a5a1e8f8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:47:52 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/wait: Fix __wait_event_hrtimeout for RT/DL tasks
On 6/27/22 11:50, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Changes to hrtimer mode (potentially made by __hrtimer_init_sleeper on
> PREEMPT_RT) are not visible to hrtimer_start_range_ns, thus not
> accounted for by hrtimer_start_expires call paths. In particular,
> __wait_event_hrtimeout suffers from this problem as we have, for
> example:
>
> fs/aio.c::read_events
> wait_event_interruptible_hrtimeout
> __wait_event_hrtimeout
> hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack <- this might "mode |= HRTIMER_MODE_HARD"
> on RT if task runs at RT/DL priority
> hrtimer_start_range_ns
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(mode & HRTIMER_MODE_HARD) ^ !timer->is_hard)
> fires since the latter doesn't see the change of mode done by
> init_sleeper
>
> Fix it by making __wait_event_hrtimeout call hrtimer_sleeper_start_expires,
> which is aware of the special RT/DL case, instead of hrtimer_start_range_ns.
>
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists