[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppCxrcQOtCDZvUX-CThGV7aZXYv__gz3KRBf28TCRTBEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:59:41 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq8064: reorganize node order and
sort them
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 12:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 18/07/2022 17:38, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Reorganize node order and sort them by address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This was picked from for-next qcom branch [1]. Reorganize dtsi as requested.
> >
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/?h=for-next
>
> If this is picked by qcom branch, no need to resend it.
>
> I don't see value in such reshuffle. Reviewing is not possible and you
> did not mention tests (results should be equal).
The value is usual for all the cleanups: make it follow the
established practice.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists