linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq8064: reorganize node order and sort them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78230095-6b45-4536-f41d-12bb23308d34@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:16:46 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq8064: reorganize node order and
 sort them

On 19/07/2022 11:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 12:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/07/2022 17:38, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Reorganize node order and sort them by address.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This was picked from for-next qcom branch [1]. Reorganize dtsi as requested.
>>>
>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/?h=for-next
>>
>> If this is picked by qcom branch, no need to resend it.
>>
>> I don't see value in such reshuffle. Reviewing is not possible and you
>> did not mention tests (results should be equal).
> 
> The value is usual for all the cleanups: make it follow the
> established practice.

Are you sure this is established practice? New DTSI files (see SC8280XP,
sm8450 although sc7280 looked ordered) do not always follow it, so why
imposing it for existing code? Such reshuffle can cause conflicts thus
stops parallel development. Review is close to impossible...

Best regards,
Krzysztof