[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a659f24-b9d5-2772-920b-3dfec73d1106@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:45:16 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Xin Gao <gaoxin@...rlc.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata:do not initialise statics to 0
On 7/19/22 20:42, Xin Gao wrote:
> do not initialise statics to 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Gao <gaoxin@...rlc.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index 40e816419f48..bbb98433d160 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int atapi_enabled = 1;
> module_param(atapi_enabled, int, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(atapi_enabled, "Enable discovery of ATAPI devices (0=off, 1=on [default])");
>
> -static int atapi_dmadir = 0;
> +static int atapi_dmadir;
> module_param(atapi_dmadir, int, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(atapi_dmadir, "Enable ATAPI DMADIR bridge support (0=off [default], 1=on)");
>
Is this solving any static analyzer or compiler warning ? If not, this is
not a very useful change.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists