[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0fd229d-afa6-c66d-3e55-09ac5877453e@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:31:34 +0200
From: "Gupta, Pankaj" <pankaj.gupta@....com>
To: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/14] KVM: Register/unregister the guest private
memory regions
>>>>> +bool __weak kvm_arch_private_mem_supported(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return false;
>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> Does this function has to be overriden by SEV and TDX to support the private
>>>> regions?
>>>
>>> Yes it should be overridden by architectures which want to support it.
>>
>> o.k
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int check_memory_region_flags(const struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem)
>>>>> {
>>>>> u32 valid_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
>>>>> @@ -4689,6 +4729,22 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>>>>> r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(kvm, &mem);
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
>>>>> + case KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION:
>>>>> + case KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_UNREG_REGION: {
>>>>> + struct kvm_enc_region region;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!kvm_arch_private_mem_supported(kvm))
>>>>> + goto arch_vm_ioctl;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + r = -EFAULT;
>>>>> + if (copy_from_user(®ion, argp, sizeof(region)))
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_encrypted_region(kvm, ioctl, ®ion);
>>>>
>>>> this is to store private region metadata not only the encrypted region?
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>
>> Sorry for not being clear, was suggesting name change of this function from:
>> "kvm_vm_ioctl_set_encrypted_region" to "kvm_vm_ioctl_set_private_region"
>
> Though I don't have strong reason to change it, I'm fine with this and
Yes, no strong reason, just thought "kvm_vm_ioctl_set_private_region"
would depict the actual functionality :)
> this name matches the above kvm_arch_private_mem_supported perfectly.
BTW could not understand this, how "kvm_vm_ioctl_set_encrypted_region"
matches "kvm_arch_private_mem_supported"?
Thanks,
Pankaj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists