linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] s390/crash: support multi-segment iterators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:44:07 +0200
From:   Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] s390/crash: support multi-segment iterators

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 04:17:20AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> OK...  Do you prefer it to go through s390 tree?  The thing is, I've
> stuff in iov_iter tree that conflicts with it; I'll gladly drop that
> bit (vfs.git #fixes-s390) in favour of your series (and drop s390
> bits from "new iov_iter flavour - ITER_UBUF" in #work.iov_iter - they
> are not needed anymore).
> 
> I can put your series into replacement of #fixes-s390, or pull it
> from whatever static branch you put it into - up to you.
> Preferences?

Hi Al,

I am preparing a branch for you.
Will retest it and let you know once it is done.

Thanks!