[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH7PR84MB18380BBEA0E8C1A4A3721865828E9@PH7PR84MB1838.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:17:50 +0000
From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "rrichter@...vell.com" <rrichter@...vell.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Elliott, Robert (Servers)" <elliott@....com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] EDAC/ghes: Fix buffer overflow in ghes_edac_register()
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> I think it'll be more user-friendly to put
>
> "PROC 1 DIMM 1" for device
>
> and
>
> "NA" or so for bank
>
> instead of setting the label to the NULL string.
>
> I.e., relax that
>
> if (bank && *bank && device && *device)
>
> check there.
Good idea. I will send a v2 patch to set "NA" in case device or bank
is null.
Thanks,
Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists