[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ytg2EA+2XtzPiyBE@yury-laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:06:24 -0700
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] smp: optimize smp_call_function_many_cond() for
more
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:29:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:28:36PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
>
> > ---
> > kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index 7ed2b9b12f74..f96fdf944b4a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -942,7 +942,11 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
> >
> > if (run_remote) {
> > cfd = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_data);
> > - cpumask_and(cfd->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> > + if (mask == cpu_online_mask)
> > + cpumask_copy(cfd->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
> > + else
> > + cpumask_and(cfd->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> > +
>
> Or... you could optimize cpumask_and() to detect the src1p == src2p case?
This is not what I would consider as optimization. For vast majority
of users this check is useless because they know for sure that
cpumasks are different.
For this case I can invent something like cpumask_and_check_eq(), so
that there'll be minimal impact on user code. (Suggestions for a better
name are very welcome.)
Thanks,
Yury
Powered by blists - more mailing lists