[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjdQbdQGKkQxxEcWoUp4SRmBWm=3bS20SbaVe8cLgKLgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 11:07:26 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@...z.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
Joseph Nuzman <joseph.nuzman@...el.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: Call depth tracking mitigation
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:50 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> [ 2.464117] missing return thunk: lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing+0x0/0x8-lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing+0x5/0x8: e9 00 00 00 00
Well, that looks like a "jmp" instruction that has never been relocated.
The 'e9' is 'jmp', the four zeros after it are either "I'm jumping to
the next instruction" or "I haven't been filled in".
I'm assuming it's the second case.
That lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing thing is odd, and does
OBJCOPYFLAGS_rodata_objcopy.o := \
--rename-section
.noinstr.text=.rodata,alloc,readonly,load,contents
to put the code in an odd section. I'm assuming this hackery is
related to it then not getting relocated.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists