linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/231] 5.18.13-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ytha8yjbJ3c3QNVu@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 21:43:47 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Viktor Jägersküpper 
        <viktor_jaegerskuepper@...enet.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/231] 5.18.13-rc1 review

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:05:55PM +0200, Viktor Jägersküpper wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.13 release.
> > There are 231 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I noticed that there are several patches in the list which are also part of your
> retbleed-5.18 queue. If I am not mistaken, these are:
> 
> [PATCH 5.18 145/231] x86/kvm: Fix SETcc emulation for return thunks
> [PATCH 5.18 146/231] x86/sev: Avoid using __x86_return_thunk
> [PATCH 5.18 147/231] x86/bugs: Report AMD retbleed vulnerability
> [PATCH 5.18 148/231] objtool: Update Retpoline validation
> [PATCH 5.18 149/231] x86/xen: Rename SYS* entry points
> [PATCH 5.18 150/231] x86/cpu/amd: Add Spectral Chicken
> 
> I'm wondering if this is intended or if it would be better to release a stable
> kernel with all the retbleed patches later because of the problems that came up
> with these patches so far. I'm just a user, so I can't say anything about the
> technical side, and I don't know how the patches were selected.

Yes, sorry, I need to drop those and then add them only as part of the
retbleed stuff.

thanks,

greg k-h