[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220720225615.lrt7xnxv3trmiyc7@treble>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:56:15 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@...z.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
Joseph Nuzman <joseph.nuzman@...el.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: Keep the rodata test from causing retbleed
WARNINGS
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 01:13:05PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 03:55:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > The rodata test checks if executable code in the .rodata section will not
> > execute. But this also means that fix ups that the return hook code does
> > will not be able to change this code at boot up, and this causes a
> > warning.
> >
> > By removing the RETHOOK_CFLAGS from the compilation of the rodata function
> > makes it hidden from objtool and it will not add its return hook into the
> > .returns section. This keeps the fix up code from trying and failing on
> > modifying the rodata return call.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220720125736.48164a14@gandalf.local.home/
> >
> > Fixes: ee88d363d1561 ("x86,static_call: Use alternative RET encoding")
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> Yeah, this matches a portion of what was suggested:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220713213133.455599-1-keescook@chromium.org/
>
> But it still needed objtool fixes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220715032333.neywlazczbb35w3b@treble/
>
> Perhaps objtool has already had patches landed for this? (Otherwise the
> patch you suggested would fail to build on x86 with rethunk support.)
I send this patch out a few days ago, nobody picked it up yet:
https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/8ec0039712f252693049c70ed3891d39a2357112.1658155446.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists