[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGtprH9knCr++C7jgXYCi1zfYcreip1uun-d+eucjEQy9xymNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:08:10 -0700
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, aarcange@...hat.com,
ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, mhocko@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] KVM: Handle page fault for private memory
> > Hmm, so a new slot->arch.page_attr array shouldn't be necessary, KVM can instead
> > update slot->arch.lpage_info on shared<->private conversions. Detecting whether
> > a given range is partially mapped could get nasty if KVM defers tracking to the
> > backing store, but if KVM itself does the tracking as was previously suggested[*],
> > then updating lpage_info should be relatively straightfoward, e.g. use
> > xa_for_each_range() to see if a given 2mb/1gb range is completely covered (fully
> > shared) or not covered at all (fully private).
> >
> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YofeZps9YXgtP3f1@google.com
>
> Yes, slot->arch.page_attr was introduced to help identify whether a page
> is completely shared/private at given level. It seems XARRAY can serve
> the same purpose, though I know nothing about it. Looking forward to
> seeing the patch of using XARRAY.
>
> yes, update slot->arch.lpage_info is good to utilize the existing logic
> and Isaku has applied it to slot->arch.lpage_info for 2MB support patches.
Chao, are you planning to implement these changes to ensure proper
handling of hugepages partially mapped as private/shared in subsequent
versions of this series?
Or is this something left to be handled by the architecture specific code?
Regards,
Vishal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists