[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtiVH83GZwMkSJP1@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:51:59 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: x86: emulator: remove assign_eip_near/far
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Now the assign_eip_far just updates the emulation mode in addition to
> updating the rip, it doesn't make sense to keep that function.
>
> Move mode update to the callers and remove these functions.
I disagree, IMO there's a lot of value in differentiating between near and far.
Yeah, the assign_eip_near() wrapper is kinda silly, but have that instead of
a bare assign_eip() documents that e.g. jmp_rel() is a near jump and that it's
not missing an update.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists