linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220719213704.5f4a5d61@rorschach.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:37:21 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building
 strings

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:49 -0400
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com> wrote:

> > No, my response is, why should we replace something that is working
> > just fine?  
> For you. For your code.

For the current working kernel.

> 
> Look, Steve, I've tried to work with you. And I've given you reasons why 
> seq_buf doesn't work for vsprintf.c, and more general cases. You have 

Please post the lore links, I'll go back and read them.

> not responded _at all_ with technical reasons or discussion, all you've 
> done from the very start is lecture me on process.

That's because process *is* the way things get into upstream. I guess
you fail to understand that.

> 
> And, to be blunt, the time to have the printbuf vs. seq_buf discussion 
> was months ago. I tried to start that discussion with you, and you 
> ghosted on IRC when I started talking about the things in seq_buf that 
> would have to change.

Look, that was when I was traveling. And when I'm traveling I pretty
much do not respond to IRC.

> 
> Like I said, I'll CC you when v5 is posted.

OK.

-- Steve