[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtdgUOJlTc4aB+82@ZenIV>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 02:54:24 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] vfs: add propagate_mount_tree_busy() helper
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:37:46AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> +static int do_mount_in_use_check(struct mount *mnt, int cnt)
> +{
> + struct mount *topper;
> +
> + /* Is there exactly one mount on the child that covers
> + * it completely?
> + */
> + topper = find_topper(mnt);
> + if (topper) {
> + int topper_cnt = topper->mnt_mounts_cnt + 1;
> +
> + /* Open file or pwd within singular mount? */
> + if (do_refcount_check(topper, topper_cnt))
> + return 1;
Whatever the hell for? umount(2) will be able to slide the
underlying mount from under the topper, whatever the
refcount of topper might have been.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists