linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: Remove some useless functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d49c6cca-2980-41b1-0f59-32ddcbb1dfa2@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:03:43 +0800
From:   Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: Remove some useless functions



On 7/19/22 6:01 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> __ocfs2_node_map_set_bit() and __ocfs2_node_map_set_bit() are just
> wrapper around set_bit() and clear_bit().
> 
> The leading __ also makes think that these functions are non-atomic just
> like __set_bit() and __clear_bit().
> 
> So, just remove these wrappers and call set_bit() and clear_bit()
> directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>

Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>

> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c | 21 ++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c b/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c
> index 9099d8fc7599..1d72e0788943 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/heartbeat.c
> @@ -24,11 +24,6 @@
>  
>  #include "buffer_head_io.h"
>  
> -static inline void __ocfs2_node_map_set_bit(struct ocfs2_node_map *map,
> -					    int bit);
> -static inline void __ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(struct ocfs2_node_map *map,
> -					      int bit);
> -
>  /* special case -1 for now
>   * TODO: should *really* make sure the calling func never passes -1!!  */
>  static void ocfs2_node_map_init(struct ocfs2_node_map *map)
> @@ -65,12 +60,6 @@ void ocfs2_do_node_down(int node_num, void *data)
>  	ocfs2_recovery_thread(osb, node_num);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void __ocfs2_node_map_set_bit(struct ocfs2_node_map *map,
> -					    int bit)
> -{
> -	set_bit(bit, map->map);
> -}
> -
>  void ocfs2_node_map_set_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  			    struct ocfs2_node_map *map,
>  			    int bit)
> @@ -79,16 +68,10 @@ void ocfs2_node_map_set_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  		return;
>  	BUG_ON(bit >= map->num_nodes);
>  	spin_lock(&osb->node_map_lock);
> -	__ocfs2_node_map_set_bit(map, bit);
> +	set_bit(bit, map->map);
>  	spin_unlock(&osb->node_map_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void __ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(struct ocfs2_node_map *map,
> -					      int bit)
> -{
> -	clear_bit(bit, map->map);
> -}
> -
>  void ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  			      struct ocfs2_node_map *map,
>  			      int bit)
> @@ -97,7 +80,7 @@ void ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  		return;
>  	BUG_ON(bit >= map->num_nodes);
>  	spin_lock(&osb->node_map_lock);
> -	__ocfs2_node_map_clear_bit(map, bit);
> +	clear_bit(bit, map->map);
>  	spin_unlock(&osb->node_map_lock);
>  }
>