lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1wocwp4.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:03:19 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Gabriel Paubert <paubert@...m.es>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] random: handle archrandom in plural words

Gabriel Paubert <paubert@...m.es> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:31:11PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> writes:
>> > The archrandom interface was originally designed for x86, which supplies
>> > RDRAND/RDSEED for receiving random words into registers, resulting in
>> > one function to generate an int and another to generate a long. However,
>> > other architectures don't follow this.
>> >
>> > On arm64, the SMCCC TRNG interface can return between 1 and 3 words. On
>> > s390, the CPACF TRNG interface can return between 1 and 32 words for the
>> > same cost as for one word. On UML, the os_getrandom() interface can return
>> > arbitrary amounts.
>> >
>> > So change the api signature to take a "words" parameter designating the
>> > maximum number of words requested, and then return the number of words
>> > generated.
>> 
>> On powerpc a word is 32-bits and a doubleword is 64-bits (at least
>> according to the ISA). I think that's also true on other 64-bit
>> architectures.
>
> IIRC, this is (or was) not the case on Alpha, where word was defined as
> 16 bits. All assembly mnemonics had w for 16 bits, l for 32 bits, and q
> for 64 bits.

Yeah I should have said on *some* other 64-bit arches.

Seems to be a common feature/hack on arches that have evolved over time,
or been inspired by earlier arches.

The latest Power ISA has octwords :)

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ