[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220720060627.r7ifcxu6uopgsasw@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 08:06:27 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pm_runtime_resume_and_get in .remove callbacks
Hello Rafael,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 07:47:39PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:47 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > there is a big bunch of kernel drivers (here:
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c) that have a remove callback that looks as
> > follows:
> >
> > static int sprd_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(i2c_dev->dev);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > i2c_del_adapter(&i2c_dev->adap);
> > clk_disable_unprepare(i2c_dev->clk);
> >
> > pm_runtime_put_noidle(i2c_dev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_disable(i2c_dev->dev);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > If pm_runtime_resume_and_get fails, the i2c adapter isn't removed, but
> > as the memory backing i2c_dev goes away---it was allocated using
> > devm_kzalloc in .probe()---the next i2c action will probably access
> > freed memory.
> >
> > I'm not familiar enough with pm-runtime stuff, but wonder what
> > can/should be done about that. The obvious (to me) candidates are:
> >
> > - log an error if pm_runtime_resume_and_get() fails, but continue to
> > clean up
> > - don't check the return value at all
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> (1) Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
> and don't check its return value,
>
> or if that is not viable, because something really can run if and only
> if the device is operational,
>
> (2) do something like
>
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(i2c_dev->dev);
> i2c_del_adapter(&i2c_dev->adap);
> if (ret >= 0)
> clk_disable_unprepare(i2c_dev->clk);
>
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(i2c_dev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(i2c_dev->dev);
Why would you not disable the clk if the resume failed?
Is it an option to not call one of the resume variants at all and only
call pm_runtime_disable()?
Thanks for your input,
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists