[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d7f546f-a497-f580-6439-0a543afb26d8@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:50:32 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mlevitsk@...hat.com, jon.grimm@....com,
Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Do not block APIC write for non ICR registers
Paolo / Sean,
Please let me know if you want me to send v2 with changes proposed by Sean.
Regards,
Suravee
On 7/19/22 10:24 AM, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> Sean,
>
> On 7/19/2022 12:28 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>> The commit 5413bcba7ed5 ("KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write
>>> VM-Exits in x2APIC mode") introduces logic to prevent APIC write
>>> for offset other than ICR. This breaks x2AVIC support, which requires
>>> KVM to trap and emulate x2APIC MSR writes.
>>>
>>> Therefore, removes the warning and modify to logic to allow MSR write.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5413bcba7ed5 ("KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write VM-Exits in x2APIC mode")
>>
>> This tag is wrong, I believe it should be:
>>
>> Fixes: 4d1d7942e36a ("KVM: SVM: Introduce logic to (de)activate x2AVIC mode")
>>
>> And that absolutely matters because this should not be backported to older
>> kernels that don't support x2avic.
>
> The commit 5413bcba7ed5 is the one that modifies the logic in the kvm_apic_write_nodecode().
> I understand your point that the 5413bcba7ed is committed later than 4d1d7942e36a and being
> affected by the change. However, if there is a case that only x2AVIC stuff is being backported
> w/o the virtualize IPI stuff, then this fix is not needed. Hence, I would say the fix is for
> the 5413bcba7ed5 as specified in the original patch.
>
>>> .....
>>> */
>>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset != APIC_ICR))
>>> + if (offset == APIC_ICR) {
>>> + kvm_apic_send_ipi(apic, (u32)val, (u32)(val >> 32));
>>> + trace_kvm_apic_write(APIC_ICR, val);
>>> return;
>>> -
>>> - kvm_lapic_msr_read(apic, offset, &val);
>>> - kvm_apic_send_ipi(apic, (u32)val, (u32)(val >> 32));
>>> - trace_kvm_apic_write(APIC_ICR, val);
>>> + }
>>> + kvm_lapic_msr_write(apic, offset, val);
>>
>> Because this lacks the TODO below, what about tweaking this so that there's a
>> single call to kvm_lapic_msr_write()? gcc-11 even generates more efficient code
>> for this. Alternatively, the ICR path can be an early return inside a single
>> x2APIC check, but gcc generate identical code and I like making x2APIC+ICR stand
>> out as being truly special.
>
> That sounds good.
>
>> Compile tested only.
>>
>> ---
>> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:16:02 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Handle trap-like x2APIC accesses for any APIC
>> register
>>
>> Handle trap-like VM-Exits for all APIC registers when the guest is in
>> x2APIC mode and drop the now-stale WARN that KVM encounters trap-like
>> exits only for ICR. On Intel, only writes to ICR can be trap-like when
>> APICv and x2APIC are enabled, but AMD's x2AVIC can trap more registers,
>> e.g. LDR and DFR.
>>
>> Fixes: 4d1d7942e36a ("KVM: SVM: Introduce logic to (de)activate x2AVIC mode")
>> Reported-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>> Cc: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
>> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> index 9d4f73c4dc02..95bb1ef37a12 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> @@ -2283,21 +2283,20 @@ void kvm_apic_write_nodecode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 offset)
>> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>> u64 val;
>>
>> - if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
>> - /*
>> - * When guest APIC is in x2APIC mode and IPI virtualization
>> - * is enabled, accessing APIC_ICR may cause trap-like VM-exit
>> - * on Intel hardware. Other offsets are not possible.
>> - */
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset != APIC_ICR))
>> - return;
>> -
>> + if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
>> kvm_lapic_msr_read(apic, offset, &val);
>> + else
>> + val = kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, offset);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * ICR is a single 64-bit register when x2APIC is enabled. For legacy
>> + * xAPIC, ICR writes need to go down the common (slightly slower) path
>> + * to get the upper half from ICR2.
>> + */
>> + if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic) && offset == APIC_ICR) {
>> kvm_apic_send_ipi(apic, (u32)val, (u32)(val >> 32));
>> trace_kvm_apic_write(APIC_ICR, val);
>> } else {
>> - val = kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, offset);
>> -
>> /* TODO: optimize to just emulate side effect w/o one more write */
>> kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, offset, (u32)val);
>> }
>>
>> base-commit: 8031d87aa9953ddeb047a5356ebd0b240c30f233
>> --
>
> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>
> Suravee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists