[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <165831241337.14288.12233136434309116921.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:20:13 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, mka@...omium.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, quic_cpratapa@...cinc.com,
quic_avuyyuru@...cinc.com, quic_jponduru@...cinc.com,
quic_subashab@...cinc.com, elder@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipa: initialize ring indexes to 0
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:18:55 -0500 you wrote:
> When a GSI channel is initially allocated, and after it has been
> reset, the hardware assumes its ring index is 0. And although we
> do initialize channels this way, the comments in the IPA code don't
> really explain this. For event rings, it doesn't matter what value
> we use initially, so using 0 is just fine.
>
> Add some information about the assumptions made by hardware above
> the definition of the gsi_ring structure in "gsi.h".
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: ipa: initialize ring indexes to 0
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5fb859f79f4f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists