[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO6PR02MB8753B9C4BAA3ABF34508DBABEF8E9@CO6PR02MB8753.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:45:33 +0000
From: "Kassey Li (QUIC)" <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kassey Li (QUIC)" <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mm/cma_debug.c: align the name buffer length as struct
cma
Hi, Andrew:
Is it the case that the output is never >16 chars anyway? If so, we'll be OK.
>> Yes. I verified on my device by giving cma.name length l< 16 and >16 both. Result is OK. I mean > 16 showed correctly with this patch.
>> without this patch, cma.name > 16, only showed 16 characters.
Best Regards
Kassey
This technical data may be subject to U.S. and international export, re-export, or transfer ("export") laws. Diversion contrary to U.S. and international law is strictly prohibited.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 7:19 AM
To: Kassey Li (QUIC) <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>; Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>; Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/cma_debug.c: align the name buffer length as struct cma
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:15:54 +0800 Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
> ---
> mm/cma_debug.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/cma_debug.c b/mm/cma_debug.c index
> 2e7704955f4f..c3ffe253e055 100644
> --- a/mm/cma_debug.c
> +++ b/mm/cma_debug.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(cma_alloc_fops, NULL,
> cma_alloc_write, "%llu\n"); static void cma_debugfs_add_one(struct
> cma *cma, struct dentry *root_dentry) {
> struct dentry *tmp;
> - char name[16];
> + char name[CMA_MAX_NAME];
>
> scnprintf(name, sizeof(name), "cma-%s", cma->name);
Seems logical. But as CMA_MAX_NAME=64, this could result in alteration of the output: less truncation of the original name.
Is it the case that the output is never >16 chars anyway? If so, we'll be OK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists