linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] asm-generic: Add new pci.h and use it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YtgB8SDLB4d0adfB@antec>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:24:01 +0900
From:   Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] asm-generic: Add new pci.h and use it

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:09:35PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Stafford Horne
> > Sent: 19 July 2022 13:24
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 01:55:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:55 PM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:

> > Option 3:
> > 
> > > Or we could try to keep the generic definition in a global header
> > > like linux/isa-dma.h.
> > 
> > Perhaps option 3 makes the whole patch the most clean.
> 
> Isn't there a define that can be used inside an if?
> So you could do:
> 		if (!IS_CONFIG_X86_32 || !isa_dma_bridge_buggy)
> 			disable_dma();
> (but I can't remember the name!)

I think you probably mean:

  if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) ... )

That could work too, but we still want to move the definition of
isa_dma_bridge_buggy out of architectures and into the global header.  I have
gone with option 3 for now.

-Stafford