[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtmBmKa01DBlZO4t@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:40:56 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] net: phylink: Support differing link/interface
speed/duplex
> > I thought we had decided that using the term "link" in these new members
> > was a bad idea.
>
> I saw that you and Andrew were not in favor, but I did not get a response to
> my defense of this terminology. That said, this is not a terribly large
> change to make.
I know Russell tends to use media side, and i use line side. I would
be happy with either. I think we both use host side.
"link" is way to ambiguous.
I do understand you not wanting to change phydev->speed, it is used in
a lot of places. But maybe changing it is good, you then get to look
at the code and decide does it want the media speed, or the host
speed.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists