[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a5b9c8a-f074-e6ce-d458-61068452e43f@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:28:58 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: xinlei.lee@...iatek.com, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
matthias.bgg@...il.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, jitao.shi@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7, 2/4] drm/mediatek: Separate poweron/poweroff from
enable/disable and define new funcs
Il 20/05/22 04:00, xinlei.lee@...iatek.com ha scritto:
> From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
>
> In order to match the changes of "Use the drm_panel_bridge API",
> the poweron/poweroff of dsi is extracted from enable/disable and
> defined as new funcs (atomic_pre_enable/atomic_post_disable).
>
> Since dsi_poweron is moved from dsi_enable to pre_enable function, in
> order to avoid poweron failure, the operation of dsi register fails to
> cause bus hang. Therefore, the protection mechanism is added to the
> dsi_enable function.
>
> Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the drm_panel_bridge API")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
Hello Xinlei, CK, maintainers:
This patch is breaking machines that are using a DSI->DisplayPort bridge (like
the ANX7625 chip), but that's not the main issue.
----> I have never given a Reviewed-by tag for this commit <----
It's true I've given my tag for an older version [1] of this one, which was *not*
using atomic_* callbacks and that one worked fine (which is why I gave you
my R-b tag for it).
You have changed commits in this series to use atomic_(pre_)enable callbacks
but kept my tag, which is seriously wrong - and even more, because it's actually
breaking display support for a generous number of Chromebooks upstream.
Please be careful next time and ask for a new review when you make substantial
changes to your commits.
Anyway, I have already sent a fix for this situation, please look at [2].
Regards,
Angelo
[1]:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1649644308-8455-3-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com/
[2]:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220721172727.14624-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/T/#u
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index f880136cec09..d9a6b928dba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> if (--dsi->refcount != 0)
> return;
>
> - /*
> - * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
> - * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
> - * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable irq.
> - * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
> - * after dsi is fully set.
> - */
> - mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
> -
> - mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
> mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
> @@ -715,17 +705,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>
> static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> if (dsi->enabled)
> return;
>
> - ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1);
>
> @@ -739,7 +721,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> if (!dsi->enabled)
> return;
>
> - mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
> + /*
> + * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
> + * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
> + * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable irq.
> + * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
> + * after dsi is fully set.
> + */
> + mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
> +
> + mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
>
> dsi->enabled = false;
> }
> @@ -776,13 +767,37 @@ static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> {
> struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
>
> + if (dsi->refcount == 0)
> + return;
> +
> mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi);
> }
>
> +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +
> + mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
> +}
> +
> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
> .attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach,
> .atomic_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable,
> .atomic_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable,
> + .atomic_pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> + .atomic_post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
> .mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set,
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists