linux-kernel - Re: Why set .suppress_bind_attrs even though .remove() implemented?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:48:56 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <pali@...nel.org>, <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     <kishon@...com>, <songxiaowei@...ilicon.com>,
        <wangbinghui@...ilicon.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <tjoseph@...ence.com>, <kw@...ux.com>,
        <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why set .suppress_bind_attrs even though .remove() implemented?

On 21/07/2022 21:46, Pali Rohár wrote:
> 
> Microchip driver wanted to change its type from bool to tristate
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220420093449.38054-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/t/#u
> and after discussion it seems that it is needed to do more work for this
> driver.
> 

Still planned, but other things are taking up time atm
unfortunately!