[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220721205819.GA1753070@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:58:19 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: wangseok.lee@...sung.com,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jesper.nilsson@...s.com" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"lars.persson@...s.com" <lars.persson@...s.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...s.com" <linux-arm-kernel@...s.com>,
"kernel@...s.com" <kernel@...s.com>,
Moon-Ki Jun <moonki.jun@...sung.com>,
Sang Min Kim <hypmean.kim@...sung.com>,
Dongjin Yang <dj76.yang@...sung.com>,
Yeeun Kim <yeeun119.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: axis: Add ARTPEC-8 PCIe controller driver
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:04:00AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/07/2022 08:01, Wangseok Lee wrote:
> > Add support Axis, ARTPEC-8 SoC. ARTPEC-8 is the SoC platform of Axis
> > Communications. This is based on arm64 and support GEN4 & 2lane. This
> > PCIe controller is based on DesignWare Hardware core and uses DesignWare
> > core functions to implement the driver. "pcie-artpec6. c" supports artpec6
> > and artpec7 H/W. artpec8 can not be expanded because H/W configuration is
> > completely different from artpec6/7. PHY and sub controller are different.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wangseok Lee <wangseok.lee@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaeho Cho <jaeho79.cho@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > v3->v4 :
> > -Remove unnecessary enum type
> > -Fix indentation
> >
>
> Thanks for the changes. This starts to look good, however I am not going
> to ack it. This is also not a strong NAK, as I would respect Bjorn and
> other maintainers decision.
>
> I don't like the approach of creating only Artpec-8 specific driver.
> Samsung heavily reuses its block in all Exynos devices. Now it re-uses
> them for other designs as well. Therefore, even if merging with existing
> Exynos PCIe driver is not feasible (we had such discussions), I expect
> this to cover all Samsung Foundry PCIe devices. From all current designs
> up to future licensed blocks, including some new Samsung Exynos SoC. Or
> at least be ready for it.
I would certainly prefer fewer drivers but I don't know enough about
the underlying IP and the places it's integrated to to know what's
practical. The only way I could figure that out would be by manually
comparing the drivers for similarity. I assume/expect all driver
authors are doing that.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists