[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW71nehoDGTyeAvFgpTJFd1Et5GeMpqMiObzbP2g5uRVqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:23:57 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] livepatch: fix race between fork and klp_reverse_transition
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:20 AM Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
>
> When a KLP fails to apply, klp_reverse_transition will clear the
> TIF_PATCH_PENDING flag on all tasks, except for newly created tasks
> which are not on the task list yet.
>
> Meanwhile, fork will copy over the TIF_PATCH_PENDING flag from the
> parent to the child early on, in dup_task_struct -> setup_thread_stack.
>
> Much later, klp_copy_process will set child->patch_state to match
> that of the parent.
>
> However, the parent's patch_state may have been changed by KLP loading
> or unloading since it was initially copied over into the child.
>
> This results in the KLP code occasionally hitting this warning in
> klp_complete_transition:
>
> for_each_process_thread(g, task) {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING));
> task->patch_state = KLP_UNDEFINED;
> }
>
> This patch will set, or clear, the TIF_PATCH_PENDING flag in the child
> process depending on whether or not it is needed at the time
> klp_copy_process is called, at a point in copy_process where the
> tasklist_lock is held exclusively, preventing races with the KLP
> code.
>
> This should prevent this warning from triggering again in the
> future.
>
> I have not yet figured out whether this would also help with races in
> the other direction, where the child process fails to have TIF_PATCH_PENDING
> set and somehow misses a transition, or whether the retries in
> klp_try_complete_transition would catch that task and help it transition
> later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
LGTM!
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> index 5d03a2ad1066..7a90ad5e9224 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,15 @@ void klp_copy_process(struct task_struct *child)
> {
> child->patch_state = current->patch_state;
>
> - /* TIF_PATCH_PENDING gets copied in setup_thread_stack() */
> + /*
> + * The parent process may have gone through a KLP transition since
> + * the thread flag was copied in setup_thread_stack earlier. Set
> + * the flag according to whether this task needs a KLP transition.
> + */
> + if (child->patch_state != klp_target_state)
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
> + else
> + clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists