[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220721055728.718573-4-kaleshsingh@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:57:14 -0700
From: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To: maz@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com, tabba@...gle.com
Cc: will@...nel.org, qperret@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
james.morse@....com, alexandru.elisei@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
andreyknvl@...il.com, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, drjones@...hat.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, elver@...gle.com, keirf@...gle.com,
yuzenghui@...wei.com, ardb@...nel.org, oupton@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, android-mm@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common()
Move common unwind_next logic to stacktrace/common.h. This allows
reusing the code in the implementation the nVHE hypervisor stack
unwinder, later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
Changes in v5:
- Add Reviewed-by tags from Mark Brown and Fuad
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 41 ++----------------
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index f58b786460d3..0c5cbfdb56b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct unwind_state {
static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
struct stack_info *info);
+static inline bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
+ struct stack_info *info);
+
static inline bool on_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
unsigned long low, unsigned long high,
enum stack_type type, struct stack_info *info)
@@ -120,4 +124,50 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
}
+static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct stack_info *info)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
+ unsigned long fp = state->fp;
+
+ if (fp & 0x7)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, info))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (test_bit(info->type, state->stacks_done))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
+ * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
+ *
+ * Stacks can nest in several valid orders, e.g.
+ *
+ * TASK -> IRQ -> OVERFLOW -> SDEI_NORMAL
+ * TASK -> SDEI_NORMAL -> SDEI_CRITICAL -> OVERFLOW
+ *
+ * ... but the nesting itself is strict. Once we transition from one
+ * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
+ * stack.
+ */
+ if (info->type == state->prev_type) {
+ if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ __set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
+ * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
+ */
+ state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+ state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+ state->prev_fp = fp;
+ state->prev_type = info->type;
+
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* __ASM_STACKTRACE_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 94a5dd2ab8fd..834851939364 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -81,48 +81,15 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
unsigned long fp = state->fp;
struct stack_info info;
+ int err;
/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
return -ENOENT;
- if (fp & 0x7)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /*
- * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
- * at a strictly higher address than the prior record.
- *
- * Stacks can nest in several valid orders, e.g.
- *
- * TASK -> IRQ -> OVERFLOW -> SDEI_NORMAL
- * TASK -> SDEI_NORMAL -> SDEI_CRITICAL -> OVERFLOW
- *
- * ... but the nesting itself is strict. Once we transition from one
- * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
- * stack.
- */
- if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
- if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
- return -EINVAL;
- } else {
- __set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
- }
-
- /*
- * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
- * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
- */
- state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
- state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
- state->prev_fp = fp;
- state->prev_type = info.type;
+ err = unwind_next_common(state, &info);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
state->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(state->pc);
--
2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists