[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABGWkvqonbDuSXk_iaxV4a-uBtHqeSUqAufj+LZULAVqb+u07Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 08:30:41 +0200
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ltp@...ts.linux.it,
Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.de>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] can: slcan: do not sleep with a spin lock held
Hello Souptick,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 3:58 AM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 1:00 PM Dario Binacchi
> <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > We can't call close_candev() with a spin lock held, so release the lock
> > before calling it. After calling close_candev(), we can update the
> > fields of the private `struct can_priv' without having to acquire the
> > lock.
>
> But here we are updating private 'struct can_priv' before close_candev() while
> taking the lock. If we go by change logs, then spin_unlock_bh() need to called
> before close_candev() and we can update the private 'struct can_priv'
> in existing place.
sl-> rcount and sl-> xleft are not part of 'struct can_priv' and can
be reset after
calling netif_stop_queu() because it inhibits any serial reception/transmission.
Thanks and regards,
Dario
>
> >
> > Fixes: c4e54b063f42f ("can: slcan: use CAN network device driver API")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/Ysrf1Yc5DaRGN1WE@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Update the commit message.
> > - Reset sl->rcount and sl->xleft before releasing the spin lock.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Release the lock just before calling the close_candev().
> >
> > drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c
> > index 54d29a410ad5..d40ddc596596 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c
> > @@ -689,15 +689,14 @@ static int slc_close(struct net_device *dev)
> > clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &sl->tty->flags);
> > }
> > netif_stop_queue(dev);
> > + sl->rcount = 0;
> > + sl->xleft = 0;
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
> > close_candev(dev);
> > sl->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
> > if (sl->can.bittiming.bitrate == CAN_BITRATE_UNKNOWN)
> > sl->can.bittiming.bitrate = CAN_BITRATE_UNSET;
> >
> > - sl->rcount = 0;
> > - sl->xleft = 0;
> > - spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
> >
--
Dario Binacchi
Embedded Linux Developer
dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@...rulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists