lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:17:08 -0700
From:   "yuxin.ye" <yeyuxin0925@...il.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
        boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rtmutex: Fix BUG_ON at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1331!

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:25:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 7/20/22 03:28, yuxin.ye wrote:
> > before rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(),unlock lock->wait_lock will cause
> > BUG_ON at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1331:
> 
> The current upstream kernel/locking/rtmutex.c has no BUG_ON() call. Which
> version of the kernel are you using?
> 
> Cheers,
> Longman
> 

The Linux version is 5.10.
The upstream has indeed removed the BUG_ON, But in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()
it is still possible to have a thread is blocked by two locks. Can this situation
be ignored without BUG_ON?

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ