[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c59fca89-cd0c-1724-210e-d9b01b375103@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:27:03 +0200
From: "Gupta, Pankaj" <pankaj.gupta@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com, ddutile@...hat.com,
dhildenb@...hat.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/14] mm: Add F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE seal to memfd
>> Normally, a write to unallocated space of a file or the hole of a sparse
>> file automatically causes space allocation, for memfd, this equals to
>> memory allocation. This new seal prevents such automatically allocating,
>> either this is from a direct write() or a write on the previously
>> mmap-ed area. The seal does not prevent fallocate() so an explicit
>> fallocate() can still cause allocating and can be used to reserve
>> memory.
>>
>> This is used to prevent unintentional allocation from userspace on a
>> stray or careless write and any intentional allocation should use an
>> explicit fallocate(). One of the main usecases is to avoid memory double
>> allocation for confidential computing usage where we use two memfds to
>> back guest memory and at a single point only one memfd is alive and we
>> want to prevent memory allocation for the other memfd which may have
>> been mmap-ed previously. More discussion can be found at:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/14/1255
>>
>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 1 +
>> mm/memfd.c | 3 ++-
>> mm/shmem.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
>> index 2f86b2ad6d7e..98bdabc8e309 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>> #define F_SEAL_GROW 0x0004 /* prevent file from growing */
>> #define F_SEAL_WRITE 0x0008 /* prevent writes */
>> #define F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE 0x0010 /* prevent future writes while mapped */
>> +#define F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE 0x0020 /* prevent allocation for writes */
>
> Why only "on writes" and not "on reads". IIRC, shmem doesn't support the
> shared zeropage, so you'll simply allocate a new page via read() or on
> read faults.
>
>
> Also, I *think* you can place pages via userfaultfd into shmem. Not sure
> if that would count "auto alloc", but it would certainly bypass fallocate().
I was also thinking this at the same time, but for different reason:
"Want to populate private preboot memory with firmware payload", so was
thinking userfaulftd could be an option as direct writes are restricted?
Thanks,
Pankaj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists