[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ytk2dxEC2n/ffNpD@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:20:23 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org,
daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie, agross@...nel.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
quic_aravindh@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/3] eDP/DP Phy vdda realted function
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:31:41PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
If you're copying someone into a thread that's not obviously relevant
for them it's good practice to put a note about it at the top of the
mail to reduce the chances that it just gets deleted unread - people get
copies of all sorts of random stuff for not great reasons (like getting
pulled in by checkpatch due to once having done a cleanup) and are often
quicky to delete things.
> This series breaks USB and PCIe for some SC8280XP and SA540P machines
> where the DP PHY regulators are shared with other PHYs whose drivers do
> not request a load.
> Specifically, the hard-coded vdda-phy load of 21.8 mA added by this
> series, causes several RPMh regulators to now be put in low-power mode.
> I found Doug's suggestion to handle situations like this in regulator
> core:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20180814170617.100087-1-dianders@chromium.org/
> but since that was rejected, how do we deal with this generally?
> In the above thread Doug mentioned adding support for load requests to
> further drivers and Bjorn mentioned working around it by adding
> regulator-system-load properties to DT.
> It seems quite likely that changes like this one affects other systems
> too, and the effects may be hard to debug. So a more general solution
> than playing whack-a-mole using DT would be good to have.
You could add a way to specify constant base loads in DT on either a per
regulator or per consumer basis.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists