lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c28efac8fc9a8f27b21df7bfafe48a7e652d8dd.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:54:01 +0300
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: add structs for KVM's
 smram layout

On Thu, 2022-07-21 at 00:40 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Those structs will be used to read/write the smram state image.
> > 
> > Also document the differences between KVM's SMRAM layout and SMRAM
> > layout that is used by real Intel/AMD cpus.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
> > index 89246446d6aa9d..7015728da36d5f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
> > @@ -503,6 +503,145 @@ enum x86_intercept {
> >  	nr_x86_intercepts
> >  };
> >  
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * 32 bit KVM's emulated SMM layout
> > + * Loosely based on Intel's layout
> > + */
> > +
> > +struct kvm_smm_seg_state_32 {
> > +	u32 flags;
> > +	u32 limit;
> > +	u32 base;
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +struct kvm_smram_state_32 {
> > +
> > +	u32 reserved1[62];			/* FE00 - FEF7 */
> > +	u32 smbase;				/* FEF8 */
> > +	u32 smm_revision;			/* FEFC */
> > +	u32 reserved2[5];			/* FF00-FF13 */
> > +	/* CR4 is not present in Intel/AMD SMRAM image*/
> > +	u32 cr4;				/* FF14 */
> > +	u32 reserved3[5];			/* FF18 */
> 
> Again, I love this approach, but we should have compile-time asserts to verify
> the layout, e.g. see vmx_check_vmcs12_offsets().
> 

No objections, will do.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ