[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP6Zq1gB1yrqNDJROf8xyjYiCv6H-rW=Qa7J17AoFo3mv5hsLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:35:58 +0300
From: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] spi: npcm-pspi: add Arbel NPCM8XX and full duplex support
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your comment, next version I will make sure to send two
separate patches
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 15:19, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 01:15:54PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>
> > Tomer Maimon (2):
> > spi: npcm-pspi: add full duplex support
> > dt-binding: spi: npcm-pspi: Add npcm845 compatible
>
> It is not obvious why these are a series, they appear to be entirely
> orthogonal. If there's no relationship between patches it's generally
> better to send them separately, that way problems with one patch won't
> hold up unrelated patches and reviewers aren't left wondering about why
> things are grouped.
>
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
> make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
> There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.
Best regards,
Tomer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists