[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6575FDB764DDA0047B4D08E6FC909@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 20:22:47 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
"quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com" <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add Multi-Circular Queue support
> On 7/22/2022 12:37 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Manually allocate MCQ resource */
> >>> Did you consider to force providing the MCQ configuration?
> > How about this one?
> >
> Sorry missed this comment.
> Do you mean to return error if MCQ configuration is undefined?
Yes. It's like an unset platform capability.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> -asd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists