[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtsaA2Zjqa/XZZou@antec>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 06:43:31 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] asm-generic: Add new pci.h and use it
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 09:53:07AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:58 PM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:37:33PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks, you are right, I think some of the earlier functions may have needed it,
> > which is why I had it earlier. But now that we have removed those we should be
> > able to remove this.
> >
> > That said, I think some of the architecture includes could also be removed. On
> > OpenRISC we are able to get away with only having the global asm-generic/pci.h
> > so we don't need a wrapper pci.h header at all.
> >
> > However, I don't have everything setup to build all of those architectures so I
> > was being a bit conservative to remove headers. I'll see what I can do in the
> > next version.
>
> No need to worry about linux/types.h, this is pretty much included everywhere
> already and neither the risk of extraneous includes or missing ones is
> something to worry about. I'd just remove it if you do another respin, or
> we can leave it in if Bjorn wants to just apply the v5 version.
I will respin a v6 as we didn't get a reply on this. Bjorn are you planning to
apply the series before the upcoming merge window?
Originally I was thinking to merge these with my OpenRISC PCI support patches as
OpenRISC depends on this. However, the series is getting a bit more involved
for OpenRISC only.
Once you get it merged I will like to rebase my OpenRISC PCI support patches on
you branch. Hopefully, we can make it by the merge window.
Also, Palmer has a conflict with the series and his RISC-V for-next branch.
He would like to have a tag or branch to be able to merge into is branch to
resolve the conflict.
-Stafford
Powered by blists - more mailing lists