[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtpGsndCvUIlBLUs@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:41:54 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, dsahern@...nel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
pabeni@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org, leon@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Andrew Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] devlink: introduce framework for
selftests
Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 07:32:08PM CEST, vikas.gupta@...adcom.com wrote:
>Hi Jiri,
>
>
>On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 09:21:19AM CEST, vikas.gupta@...adcom.com wrote:
>> >Add a framework for running selftests.
>> >Framework exposes devlink commands and test suite(s) to the user
>> >to execute and query the supported tests by the driver.
>> >
>> >Below are new entries in devlink_nl_ops
>> >devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_list_doit/dumpit: To query the supported
>> >selftests by the drivers.
>> >devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_run: To execute selftests. Users can
>> >provide a test mask for executing group tests or standalone tests.
>> >
>> >Documentation/networking/devlink/ path is already part of MAINTAINERS &
>> >the new files come under this path. Hence no update needed to the
>> >MAINTAINERS
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>
>> >Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
>> >Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
>> >---
>> > .../networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst | 38 +++
>> > include/net/devlink.h | 20 ++
>> > include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 29 +++
>> > net/core/devlink.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++
>> > 4 files changed, 312 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst
>> >
>> >diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst
>> >new file mode 100644
>> >index 000000000000..0e9727895987
>> >--- /dev/null
>> >+++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst
>> >@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
>> >+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> >+
>> >+=================
>> >+Devlink Selftests
>> >+=================
>> >+
>> >+The ``devlink-selftests`` API allows executing selftests on the device.
>> >+
>> >+Tests Mask
>> >+==========
>> >+The ``devlink-selftests`` command should be run with a mask indicating
>> >+the tests to be executed.
>> >+
>> >+Tests Description
>> >+=================
>> >+The following is a list of tests that drivers may execute.
>> >+
>> >+.. list-table:: List of tests
>> >+ :widths: 5 90
>> >+
>> >+ * - Name
>> >+ - Description
>> >+ * - ``DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH``
>> >+ - Devices may have the firmware on non-volatile memory on the board, e.g.
>> >+ flash. This particular test helps to run a flash selftest on the device.
>> >+ Implementation of the test is left to the driver/firmware.
>> >+
>> >+example usage
>> >+-------------
>> >+
>> >+.. code:: shell
>> >+
>> >+ # Query selftests supported on the devlink device
>> >+ $ devlink dev selftests show DEV
>> >+ # Query selftests supported on all devlink devices
>> >+ $ devlink dev selftests show
>> >+ # Executes selftests on the device
>> >+ $ devlink dev selftests run DEV test flash
>>
>> "test_id" to be consistend with the attr name and outputs. Please see
>What is "test_id" referring to in this document? Can you please elaborate ?
"test_id" is consistent with the UAPI netlink attribute name, see
below.
>
>> below. Devlink cmdline would accept "test" as well, so you can still use
>Are you mentioning the "test" argument in the above devlink command line option?
Yes, the cmd line accepts shortened option names. So for "test_id", it
would accept:
"test_i"
"test_"
and "test"
I just wanted to say you, as a user, will be able to still use the
shortened version, but the option name "test_id" would be consistent
with UAPI, which is what we usually have.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists