linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: vangogh: Use non-legacy DAI naming for cs35l41

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220722090532.GF92394@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:05:32 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
CC:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: vangogh: Use non-legacy DAI naming for cs35l41

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:32:27AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Unlike most CODEC drivers, the CS35L41 driver did not have the
> non_legacy_dai_naming set, meaning the corresponding DAI has been
> traditionally registered using the legacy naming: spi-VLV1776:0x
> 
> The recent migration to the new legacy DAI naming style has implicitly
> corrected that behavior and DAI gets now registered via the non-legacy
> naming, i.e. cs35l41-pcm.
> 
> The problem is the acp5x platform driver is now broken as it continues
> to refer to the above mentioned codec using the legacy DAI naming in
> function acp5x_cs35l41_hw_params() and, therefore, the related setup
> is not being executed anymore.
> 
> Let's fix that by replacing the obsolete DAI name with the correct one.
> 
> Fixes: bc949a3b4af3 ("ASoC: core: Switch core to new DAI naming flag")

Although sorry just noticed you might want to double check the SHA
here, I think the upstream one is 129f055a2144.

Thanks,
Charles