[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220722090654.476559224@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:07:59 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 64/70] efi/x86: use naked RET on mixed mode call wrapper
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
commit 51a6fa0732d6be6a44e0032752ad2ac10d67c796 upstream.
When running with return thunks enabled under 32-bit EFI, the system
crashes with:
kernel tried to execute NX-protected page - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000005bc02900
#PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0011) - permissions violation
PGD 18f7063 P4D 18f7063 PUD 18ff063 PMD 190e063 PTE 800000005bc02063
Oops: 0011 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc6+ #166
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
RIP: 0010:0x5bc02900
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x5bc028d6.
RSP: 0018:ffffffffb3203e10 EFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000048
RDX: 000000000190dfac RSI: 0000000000001710 RDI: 000000007eae823b
RBP: ffffffffb3203e70 R08: 0000000001970000 R09: ffffffffb3203e28
R10: 747563657865206c R11: 6c6977203a696665 R12: 0000000000001710
R13: 0000000000000030 R14: 0000000001970000 R15: 0000000000000001
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8e013ca00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000005bc02900 CR3: 0000000001930000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:
? efi_set_virtual_address_map+0x9c/0x175
efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x4a6/0x53e
start_kernel+0x67c/0x71e
x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x2a
x86_64_start_kernel+0xe9/0xf4
secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xe5/0xeb
That's because it cannot jump to the return thunk from the 32-bit code.
Using a naked RET and marking it as safe allows the system to proceed
booting.
Fixes: aa3d480315ba ("x86: Use return-thunk in asm code")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_thunk_64.S | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_thunk_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_thunk_64.S
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/objtool.h>
#include <asm/page_types.h>
#include <asm/segment.h>
+#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
.text
.code64
@@ -75,7 +76,9 @@ STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD __efi64_thunk
1: movq 0x20(%rsp), %rsp
pop %rbx
pop %rbp
- RET
+ ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
+ ret
+ int3
.code32
2: pushl $__KERNEL_CS
Powered by blists - more mailing lists