linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 08/14] regulator: drivers: Add TI TPS65219 PMIC regulators support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45c6843e-0447-cf5e-6f1a-3920032ac88c@baylibre.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:30:11 +0200
From:   jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com,
        kristo@...nel.org, khilman@...libre.com, narmstrong@...libre.com,
        msp@...libre.com, j-keerthy@...c, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/14] regulator: drivers: Add TI TPS65219 PMIC
 regulators support

> @@ -0,0 +1,414 @@
 > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 > +/*
 > + * tps65219-regulator.c
 > + *

Please make the entire comment a C++ one so things look more
intentional.

checkpatch is complaining about that:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
v5.19-rc6-PB-MSP1/0005-mfd-drivers-Add-TI-TPS65219-PMIC-support.patch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: Improper SPDX comment style for 'drivers/mfd/tps65219.c', 
please use '//' instead
#91: FILE: drivers/mfd/tps65219.c:1:
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Let me know if I should ignore checkpatch recommendations here.