linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/edid: Make 144 Hz not preferred on Sharp LQ140M1JW46

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <269f2610-425b-f296-dcfc-89bdc2e1d587@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:37:46 -0700
From:   Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
CC:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/edid: Make 144 Hz not preferred on Sharp
 LQ140M1JW46

+ sankeerth

Hi Doug

On 7/21/2022 3:23 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The Sharp LQ140M1JW46 panel is on the Qualcomm sc7280 CRD reference
> board. This panel supports 144 Hz and 60 Hz. In the EDID, the 144 Hz
> mode is listed first and thus is marked preferred. The EDID decode I
> ran says:
> 
>    First detailed timing includes the native pixel format and preferred
>    refresh rate.
> 
>    ...
> 
>    Detailed Timing Descriptors:
>      DTD 1:  1920x1080  143.981 Hz  16:9   166.587 kHz  346.500 MHz
>                   Hfront   48 Hsync  32 Hback  80 Hpol N
>                   Vfront    3 Vsync   5 Vback  69 Vpol N
>      DTD 2:  1920x1080   59.990 Hz  16:9    69.409 kHz  144.370 MHz
>                   Hfront   48 Hsync  32 Hback  80 Hpol N
>                   Vfront    3 Vsync   5 Vback  69 Vpol N
> 
> I'm proposing here that the above is actually a bug and that the 60 Hz
> mode really should be considered preferred by Linux.
> 
> The argument here is that this is a laptop panel and on a laptop we
> know power will always be a concern. Presumably even if someone using
> this panel wanted to use 144 Hz for some use cases they would only do
> so dynamically and would still want the default to be 60 Hz.
> 
> Let's change the default to 60 Hz using a standard quirk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Yes, we were aware that 144Hz was getting picked. We found that while 
debugging the screen corruption issue.

Well, yes power would be less with 60Hz but so will be the performance.

The test teams have been validating with 144Hz so far so we are checking 
internally with the team whether its OKAY to goto 60Hz now since that 
kind of invalidates the testing they have been doing.

Will update this thread once we finalize.


> ---
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index bbc25e3b7220..06ff8ba216af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ static const struct edid_quirk {
>   	EDID_QUIRK('S', 'A', 'M', 596, EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_60),
>   	EDID_QUIRK('S', 'A', 'M', 638, EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_60),
>   
> +	/* 144 Hz should only be used when needed; it wastes power */
> +	EDID_QUIRK('S', 'H', 'P', 0x1523, EDID_QUIRK_PREFER_LARGE_60),
> +
>   	/* Sony PVM-2541A does up to 12 bpc, but only reports max 8 bpc */
>   	EDID_QUIRK('S', 'N', 'Y', 0x2541, EDID_QUIRK_FORCE_12BPC),
>