[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220722171534.3576419-5-dlatypov@google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:15:34 +0000
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] kunit: make kunit_kfree(NULL) a no-op to match kfree()
The real kfree() function will silently return when given a NULL.
So a user might reasonably think they can write the following code:
char *buffer = NULL;
if (param->use_buffer) buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 10, GFP_KERNEL);
...
kunit_kfree(test, buffer);
As-is, kunit_kfree() will mark the test as FAILED when buffer is NULL.
(And in earlier times, it would segfault).
Let's match the semantics of kfree().
Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
---
v1 -> v2: add this patch to the series.
---
lib/kunit/test.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index c7ca87484968..879c8db36cb5 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -698,6 +698,9 @@ static inline bool kunit_kfree_match(struct kunit *test,
void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
{
+ if (!ptr)
+ return;
+
if (kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_kfree_match, (void *)ptr))
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "kunit_kfree: %px already freed or not allocated by kunit", ptr);
}
--
2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists