linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fec6bd98-5efd-fe34-6d75-1765219acd82@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2022 10:36:11 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON

On 23/07/2022 04:37, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>
>> Currently it's 5.19.0-rc7 (torvalds tree at 4ba1329c) with a few extra 
>> patches on top, the bwmon set included.  It's possible that secure 
>> world uses it, but I do not know enough about that to say one way or 
>> the other.

To test patches you should apply them on maintainer's tree or
linux-next. Applying on other trees of course might be useful for
testing some backports, but it is independent process and different issue.

>>
>> -- steev
>>
> I think you may be right; I just applied this patchset to -next 
> (20220722) and i do not see the error message there.  On my 5.19-rc7 
> tree, i am also testing a patchset that enables qcom devices to access 
> efivars, so possibly we are ending up in secure world there?

Actually mapping of IO space should not touch secure world, so this was
a long shot assuming you test it on the next.


Best regards,
Krzysztof