linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 071/148] objtool: Fix SLS validation for kcov tail-call replacement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220723095244.084751710@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2022 11:54:43 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 071/148] objtool: Fix SLS validation for kcov tail-call replacement

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

commit 7a53f408902d913cd541b4f8ad7dbcd4961f5b82 upstream.

Since not all compilers have a function attribute to disable KCOV
instrumentation, objtool can rewrite KCOV instrumentation in noinstr
functions as per commit:

  f56dae88a81f ("objtool: Handle __sanitize_cov*() tail calls")

However, this has subtle interaction with the SLS validation from
commit:

  1cc1e4c8aab4 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")

In that when a tail-call instrucion is replaced with a RET an
additional INT3 instruction is also written, but is not represented in
the decoded instruction stream.

This then leads to false positive missing INT3 objtool warnings in
noinstr code.

Instead of adding additional struct instruction objects, mark the RET
instruction with retpoline_safe to suppress the warning (since we know
there really is an INT3).

Fixes: 1cc1e4c8aab4 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220323230712.GA8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -961,6 +961,17 @@ static void annotate_call_site(struct ob
 			               : arch_nop_insn(insn->len));
 
 		insn->type = sibling ? INSN_RETURN : INSN_NOP;
+
+		if (sibling) {
+			/*
+			 * We've replaced the tail-call JMP insn by two new
+			 * insn: RET; INT3, except we only have a single struct
+			 * insn here. Mark it retpoline_safe to avoid the SLS
+			 * warning, instead of adding another insn.
+			 */
+			insn->retpoline_safe = true;
+		}
+
 		return;
 	}
 }